- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
Clear All- Rural Digital Europe
- Publications
- SG
- International Journal of Medical Ro...
- Rural Digital Europe
- Publications
- SG
- International Journal of Medical Ro...
Loading
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Preprint , Article 2022Publisher:Research Square Platform LLC Authors: Nan Zun Teo; James Chi‐Yong Ngu;Nan Zun Teo; James Chi‐Yong Ngu;pmid: 36692195
Abstract PURPOSE Distal rectal transection following robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer can be challenging especially in the deep and narrow pelvis. This can be performed transabdominally using either a robotic stapler (RS) or laparoscopic stapler (LS). We compared the operative outcomes and ergonomic differences between RS and LS after robotic TME. METHODS We performed a single center randomized controlled trial. 40 patients with rectal or rectosigmoid cancer who were planned for elective robotic rectal surgery were randomized to either RS (N = 20) or LS (n = 20). Primary outcome was the number of stapler cartridges required to completely transect the rectum. Secondary end points included technical ease and efficacy of stapler use, completeness of the staple line, staple line bleeds, and clinically significant anastomotic leaks. RESULTS The mean number of stapler cartridges expended was similar between RS and LS (1.75 versus 2.05, p=0.082). While significantly less stapler adjustments were required in the RS group (1.55 versus 2.75, p = 0.014), complete rectal transection took a comparable amount of time (p=0.149). There were no differences in integrity of staple line, staple line bleeding and anastomotic leaks. Results from the user experience survey showed that RS scored better for control, engagement, visualization and overall experience. Experience with firing and disengagement was similar between both groups. CONCLUSION The RS was more ergonomic than the LS. While this complemented the use of robotics in rectal surgery, it did not result in a significant reduction in the number of stapler cartridges required for rectal transection.
https://doi.org/10.2... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2023Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.21203/rs.3.rs-2071813/v1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 2 citations 2 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!more_vert https://doi.org/10.2... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2023Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.21203/rs.3.rs-2071813/v1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2021Publisher:Wiley Jie Wang; Shubo Fan; Cheng Shen; Kunlin Yang; Zhihua Li; Shengwei Xiong; Chang Meng; Cuijian Zhang; Lin Cai; Zhongyuan Zhang; Wei Yu; Xiaofei Dai; Liang Cui; Zheng Zhang; Xuesong Li; Liqun Zhou;doi: 10.1002/rcs.2352
pmid: 34773371
AbstractBackgroundTo present our experiences with partial nephrectomy (PN) through retroperitoneal approach (RP) with the Kangduo robotic system.MethodsFrom December 2020 to February 2021, the perioperative data of 11 patients underwent PN through RP with the Kangduo robotic system were collected prospectively.ResultsFor the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, 72.7% of patients had a low score (4–6) and 27.3% of patients had a medium score (7–9). Seven tumours were posterior (P), four tumours were on the midline (X). All procedures were completed successfully. The median warm ischemia time was 18.5 (IQR, 13.7–21.0) min. None of the patients had positive surgical margins at definitive histology (all pT1a). No high‐grade perioperative complications or device‐related adverse events occurred. At a mean follow‐up of 8 ± 0.8 months, no complications occurred in all patients.ConclusionsRPPN using the novel Kangduo robotic system is a safe and effective option for managing posterior and lateral renal tumours with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores ≤9.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2352&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 8 citations 8 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2352&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2021Publisher:Wiley Authors: James Chi Yong Ngu; Nan-Zun Teo;James Chi Yong Ngu; Nan-Zun Teo;doi: 10.1002/rcs.2251
pmid: 33686793
AbstractObjectiveAn objective assessment of robotic assistance in colorectal surgery.BackgroundThere is a lack of objective evidence behind the claims of superior optics and improved ergonomics with robotics. This study introduces a novel method of assessing how robotics facilitates colorectal surgery.MethodsOperative videos of laparoscopic and robotic surgeries were reviewed. Two components were evaluated—scope‐holder performance was assessed using a transparent overlay to partition the video image and provide lines for measurement; assistant instrument performance was measured using a separate matrix of movement episodes and time.ResultsThe views achieved in robotic surgery were superior and less dependent on the assistant. The degree of assistance provided by the robotic system was more than that of the human assistant.ConclusionsThe use of robotics allows a trained operator to project his skills threefold—as a scope holder, operator and assistant—providing superior visualization and dynamic assistance throughout surgery.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2251&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2251&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2020Publisher:Wiley Authors: Ian Wee; Li Jen Kuo; James Chi Yong Ngu;Ian Wee; Li Jen Kuo; James Chi Yong Ngu;doi: 10.1002/rcs.2164
pmid: 32945090
AbstractBackgroundThis systematic review sought to compare the urogenital functions after laparoscopic (LAP) and robotic (ROB) surgery for rectal cancer.MethodsThis study conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines.ResultsTwenty‐six studies (n = 2709 for ROB, n = 2720 for LAP) were included. There was a lower risk of 30‐day urinary retention in the ROB group (risk ratios 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–0.99), but the long‐term risk was comparable (p = 0.460). Meta‐regression showed a small, positive relationship between age and risk of 30‐day urinary retention in both the ROB (p = 0.034) and LAP groups (p = 0.004). The International Prostate Symptom Score was better in the ROB group at 3 months (mean difference [MD] −1.58, 95% CI −3.10 to −0.05). The International Index of Erectile Function score was better in the ROB group at 6 months (MD 4.06, 95% CI 2.38 – 5.74).ConclusionWhile robotics may improve urogenital function after rectal surgery, the quality of evidence is low based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2164&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2164&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2020Publisher:Wiley Authors: Ian Wee; Li Jen Kuo; James Chi Yong Ngu;Ian Wee; Li Jen Kuo; James Chi Yong Ngu;doi: 10.1002/rcs.2113
pmid: 32304167
AbstractBackgroundErgonomics, as defined by the optimization of one's physical environment to enhance work performance, is an important consideration in surgery. While there have been reviews on the ergonomics of laparoscopy, this has not been the case for robotic surgery despite the rising number of publications.MethodsThis study was performed in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was performed on main databases to identify relevant articles.ResultsTwenty‐nine articles were included, comprising 3074 participants. Studies employing objective measurement tools showed that robotics conferred superior ergonomic benefits and reduced work load compared to laparoscopy, for both surgeons and trainees. Survey studies also demonstrated that self‐reported discomfort was lower in robotic procedures compared to laparoscopy and open surgery. Compared to other subspecialities, gynecological procedures seem to be associated with greater surgeon‐reported strain.ConclusionRobotic surgery is ergonomically superior to open and laparoscopic surgery. However, rates of physical strain remain significant and should be addressed by formal ergonomic training and adequate console familiarization.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2019Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2113&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 79 citations 79 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2019Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2113&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2018Publisher:Wiley Ping Liu; Jing Qin; Bin Duan; Qiong Wang; Xiaoyu Tan; Baoliang Zhao; Peneyra Libao Jonnathan; Chee-Kong Chui; Pheng-Ann Heng;doi: 10.1002/rcs.1952
pmid: 30117266
AbstractBackgroundWe aimed at facilitating percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for large tumors with accurate overlapping ablation planning and robot‐assisted needle insertion from a single incision port (SIP).MethodsWe developed a personalized and quantitative RFA planning method to obtain multiple needle overlapping ablation planning through a single incision. A robot with a remote center of motion mechanism was designed to perform needle insertions through a SIP according to the planning.ResultsNumerical and visual evaluation showed that the planning could yield nearly full coverage over large tumors and greatly reduce both ablation times and the ablations of normal tissues. Ex vivo and in vivo experiments showed that our robot‐assisted needle insertion system was capable of conducting the RFA procedure in large liver tumors from a SIP.ConclusionsRobot‐assisted RFA needle insertions from a SIP makes RFA treatment for large tumors more minimally invasive, predictable, and repeatable.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2018Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.1952&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 17 citations 17 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2018Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.1952&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2013Publisher:Wiley Jean-Sébastien Pelletier; Richdeep S. Gill; Xinzhe Shi; Daniel W. Birch; Shahzeer Karmali;doi: 10.1002/rcs.1500
pmid: 23749316
AbstractBackgroundCurrently, hepatic resections are being performed with robotic‐assisted systems. There is little evidence regarding the outcomes of this surgical approach. This study aims to systematically review the outcomes related to robotic‐assisted hepatic resections.MethodsA systematic search of electronic databases was completed. All human studies, limited to adults, published between 2000 to August 2011 were included.ResultsEight studies yielded a total of 170 procedures. The overall morbidity rate was 11.6% (range 0–39%). There were no mortalities reported following robotic‐assisted hepatic resection. Mean operative time was 264.8 minutes, with a mean hospital length of stay of 7.8 days. Rate of conversion was 6.6%. Cost was greater than either laparoscopy or open hepatic surgery.ConclusionsOur systematic review suggests robotic‐assisted hepatic resection is safe and feasible, with low mortality and morbidity rates. Further research is needed to determine if oncological outcomes are similar. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2013Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.1500&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 25 citations 25 popularity Average influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2013Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.1500&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2011Publisher:Wiley Aliyah, Kanji; Richdeep S, Gill; Xinzhe, Shi; Daniel W, Birch; Shahzeer, Karmali;doi: 10.1002/rcs.432
pmid: 22113977
AbstractBackgroundColorectal surgery is one of the most common procedures performed by general surgeons, with an increasing number being performed laparoscopically. Robotic technology is emerging in the ongoing evolution in minimally invasive surgery. This study systematically reviews the literature regarding the safety and feasibility of robotic‐assisted colorectal surgery.MethodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases was completed for the period 2000 to 2010. Two independent reviewers assessed the studies for relevance and inclusion, and extracted data.ResultsAfter an initial screen of 347 titles, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 854 patients were included with a mean age of 61 years and a body mass index of 25.5 kg/m2. Major complications included 27 anastamotic leaks (27/766 = 3.5%), 10 post‐operative bleeds (1.1%) and 14 post‐operative infections (1.6%). There were no mortalities reported.ConclusionsThis systematic review demonstrates that robotic‐assisted colorectal surgery is emerging as a safe and feasible option in colorectal surgery. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2011 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2011Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.432&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 30 citations 30 popularity Average influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2011 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2011Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.432&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2010Publisher:Wiley Authors: K C, Veluvolu; W T, Ang;K C, Veluvolu; W T, Ang;doi: 10.1002/rcs.340
pmid: 20623480
AbstractBackgroundPhysiological tremor is the main cause of imprecision in microsurgical procedures/robotics applications. Existing methods, such as weighted‐frequency Fourier linear combiner (WFLC), rely on estimating the tremor under the assumption that it has a single dominant frequency. This paper focuses on developing a new algorithm for accurate tremor filtering in real time.MethodsA study conducted on several novice subjects and microsurgeons showed the tremor to contain several dominant frequencies in a band, rather than a single dominant frequency. Based on the tremor characteristics, a new algorithm band‐limited multiple Fourier linear combiner (BMFLC) has been developed to estimate a band of signals with multiple dominant frequencies. A separation procedure to separate the intended motion/drift from the tremor portion is also discussed.ResultsA simulation study was first conducted to validate the theoretical development on recorded tremor data. The experimental set‐up was designed to study the real‐time performance of the proposed algorithm. Tremor sensing using accelerometers is also discussed, with the proposed algorithm. Our experiments showed that the developed BMFLC algorithm had an average tremor compensation of 64% compared to 43% for the WFLC algorithm in real‐time for one degree of freedom (1‐DOF) cancellation of tremor.ConclusionsThe BMFLC algorithm can be applied for the three axes separately and 3‐DOF cancellation of tremor can be achieved. Further research is required to deal with complex gestures involved during microsurgery. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2010 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2010Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.340&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 71 citations 71 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2010 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2010Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.340&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2009Publisher:Wiley H S S, Ho; P, Mohan; E D, Lim; D L, Li; J S P, Yuen; W S, Ng; W K O, Lau; C W S, Cheng;doi: 10.1002/rcs.232
pmid: 19145573
AbstractBackgroundWe introduce the first robotic ultrasound‐guided prostate intervention device and evaluate its safety, accuracy and repeatability.MethodsThe robotic positioning system (RPS) determines a target's x, y and z axes. It is situated with a biplane ultrasound probe on a mobile horizontal platform. The integrated software acquires ultrasound images for three‐dimensional (3D) modelling, coordinates target planning and directs the RPS.ResultsThe egg phantom evaluates the software's safety and workflow protocol. Two random targets are planned in each quadrant and biopsy needles are inserted. All were within three separate eggs. Metal wire tips are targeted and their distances from the biopsy needle tips are measured. With 20 wires, < 1 mm accuracy is obtained. Repeatability is demonstrated when previous positions are returned to with similar accuracy.ConclusionOur device demonstrates safety in a defined boundary with a repeatable accuracy of < 1 mm. It can be used for accurate prostate biopsy and treatment delivery. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2009Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.232&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 35 citations 35 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2009Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.232&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
Loading
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Preprint , Article 2022Publisher:Research Square Platform LLC Authors: Nan Zun Teo; James Chi‐Yong Ngu;Nan Zun Teo; James Chi‐Yong Ngu;pmid: 36692195
Abstract PURPOSE Distal rectal transection following robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer can be challenging especially in the deep and narrow pelvis. This can be performed transabdominally using either a robotic stapler (RS) or laparoscopic stapler (LS). We compared the operative outcomes and ergonomic differences between RS and LS after robotic TME. METHODS We performed a single center randomized controlled trial. 40 patients with rectal or rectosigmoid cancer who were planned for elective robotic rectal surgery were randomized to either RS (N = 20) or LS (n = 20). Primary outcome was the number of stapler cartridges required to completely transect the rectum. Secondary end points included technical ease and efficacy of stapler use, completeness of the staple line, staple line bleeds, and clinically significant anastomotic leaks. RESULTS The mean number of stapler cartridges expended was similar between RS and LS (1.75 versus 2.05, p=0.082). While significantly less stapler adjustments were required in the RS group (1.55 versus 2.75, p = 0.014), complete rectal transection took a comparable amount of time (p=0.149). There were no differences in integrity of staple line, staple line bleeding and anastomotic leaks. Results from the user experience survey showed that RS scored better for control, engagement, visualization and overall experience. Experience with firing and disengagement was similar between both groups. CONCLUSION The RS was more ergonomic than the LS. While this complemented the use of robotics in rectal surgery, it did not result in a significant reduction in the number of stapler cartridges required for rectal transection.
https://doi.org/10.2... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2023Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.21203/rs.3.rs-2071813/v1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 2 citations 2 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!more_vert https://doi.org/10.2... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2023 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2023Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.21203/rs.3.rs-2071813/v1&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2021Publisher:Wiley Jie Wang; Shubo Fan; Cheng Shen; Kunlin Yang; Zhihua Li; Shengwei Xiong; Chang Meng; Cuijian Zhang; Lin Cai; Zhongyuan Zhang; Wei Yu; Xiaofei Dai; Liang Cui; Zheng Zhang; Xuesong Li; Liqun Zhou;doi: 10.1002/rcs.2352
pmid: 34773371
AbstractBackgroundTo present our experiences with partial nephrectomy (PN) through retroperitoneal approach (RP) with the Kangduo robotic system.MethodsFrom December 2020 to February 2021, the perioperative data of 11 patients underwent PN through RP with the Kangduo robotic system were collected prospectively.ResultsFor the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, 72.7% of patients had a low score (4–6) and 27.3% of patients had a medium score (7–9). Seven tumours were posterior (P), four tumours were on the midline (X). All procedures were completed successfully. The median warm ischemia time was 18.5 (IQR, 13.7–21.0) min. None of the patients had positive surgical margins at definitive histology (all pT1a). No high‐grade perioperative complications or device‐related adverse events occurred. At a mean follow‐up of 8 ± 0.8 months, no complications occurred in all patients.ConclusionsRPPN using the novel Kangduo robotic system is a safe and effective option for managing posterior and lateral renal tumours with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores ≤9.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2352&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 8 citations 8 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2352&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2021Publisher:Wiley Authors: James Chi Yong Ngu; Nan-Zun Teo;James Chi Yong Ngu; Nan-Zun Teo;doi: 10.1002/rcs.2251
pmid: 33686793
AbstractObjectiveAn objective assessment of robotic assistance in colorectal surgery.BackgroundThere is a lack of objective evidence behind the claims of superior optics and improved ergonomics with robotics. This study introduces a novel method of assessing how robotics facilitates colorectal surgery.MethodsOperative videos of laparoscopic and robotic surgeries were reviewed. Two components were evaluated—scope‐holder performance was assessed using a transparent overlay to partition the video image and provide lines for measurement; assistant instrument performance was measured using a separate matrix of movement episodes and time.ResultsThe views achieved in robotic surgery were superior and less dependent on the assistant. The degree of assistance provided by the robotic system was more than that of the human assistant.ConclusionsThe use of robotics allows a trained operator to project his skills threefold—as a scope holder, operator and assistant—providing superior visualization and dynamic assistance throughout surgery.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2251&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2021Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2251&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2020Publisher:Wiley Authors: Ian Wee; Li Jen Kuo; James Chi Yong Ngu;Ian Wee; Li Jen Kuo; James Chi Yong Ngu;doi: 10.1002/rcs.2164
pmid: 32945090
AbstractBackgroundThis systematic review sought to compare the urogenital functions after laparoscopic (LAP) and robotic (ROB) surgery for rectal cancer.MethodsThis study conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines.ResultsTwenty‐six studies (n = 2709 for ROB, n = 2720 for LAP) were included. There was a lower risk of 30‐day urinary retention in the ROB group (risk ratios 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–0.99), but the long‐term risk was comparable (p = 0.460). Meta‐regression showed a small, positive relationship between age and risk of 30‐day urinary retention in both the ROB (p = 0.034) and LAP groups (p = 0.004). The International Prostate Symptom Score was better in the ROB group at 3 months (mean difference [MD] −1.58, 95% CI −3.10 to −0.05). The International Index of Erectile Function score was better in the ROB group at 6 months (MD 4.06, 95% CI 2.38 – 5.74).ConclusionWhile robotics may improve urogenital function after rectal surgery, the quality of evidence is low based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2164&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2164&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2020Publisher:Wiley Authors: Ian Wee; Li Jen Kuo; James Chi Yong Ngu;Ian Wee; Li Jen Kuo; James Chi Yong Ngu;doi: 10.1002/rcs.2113
pmid: 32304167
AbstractBackgroundErgonomics, as defined by the optimization of one's physical environment to enhance work performance, is an important consideration in surgery. While there have been reviews on the ergonomics of laparoscopy, this has not been the case for robotic surgery despite the rising number of publications.MethodsThis study was performed in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was performed on main databases to identify relevant articles.ResultsTwenty‐nine articles were included, comprising 3074 participants. Studies employing objective measurement tools showed that robotics conferred superior ergonomic benefits and reduced work load compared to laparoscopy, for both surgeons and trainees. Survey studies also demonstrated that self‐reported discomfort was lower in robotic procedures compared to laparoscopy and open surgery. Compared to other subspecialities, gynecological procedures seem to be associated with greater surgeon‐reported strain.ConclusionRobotic surgery is ergonomically superior to open and laparoscopic surgery. However, rates of physical strain remain significant and should be addressed by formal ergonomic training and adequate console familiarization.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2019Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2113&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 79 citations 79 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2019Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.2113&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2018Publisher:Wiley Ping Liu; Jing Qin; Bin Duan; Qiong Wang; Xiaoyu Tan; Baoliang Zhao; Peneyra Libao Jonnathan; Chee-Kong Chui; Pheng-Ann Heng;doi: 10.1002/rcs.1952
pmid: 30117266
AbstractBackgroundWe aimed at facilitating percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for large tumors with accurate overlapping ablation planning and robot‐assisted needle insertion from a single incision port (SIP).MethodsWe developed a personalized and quantitative RFA planning method to obtain multiple needle overlapping ablation planning through a single incision. A robot with a remote center of motion mechanism was designed to perform needle insertions through a SIP according to the planning.ResultsNumerical and visual evaluation showed that the planning could yield nearly full coverage over large tumors and greatly reduce both ablation times and the ablations of normal tissues. Ex vivo and in vivo experiments showed that our robot‐assisted needle insertion system was capable of conducting the RFA procedure in large liver tumors from a SIP.ConclusionsRobot‐assisted RFA needle insertions from a SIP makes RFA treatment for large tumors more minimally invasive, predictable, and repeatable.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2018Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.1952&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 17 citations 17 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2018Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.1952&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2013Publisher:Wiley Jean-Sébastien Pelletier; Richdeep S. Gill; Xinzhe Shi; Daniel W. Birch; Shahzeer Karmali;doi: 10.1002/rcs.1500
pmid: 23749316
AbstractBackgroundCurrently, hepatic resections are being performed with robotic‐assisted systems. There is little evidence regarding the outcomes of this surgical approach. This study aims to systematically review the outcomes related to robotic‐assisted hepatic resections.MethodsA systematic search of electronic databases was completed. All human studies, limited to adults, published between 2000 to August 2011 were included.ResultsEight studies yielded a total of 170 procedures. The overall morbidity rate was 11.6% (range 0–39%). There were no mortalities reported following robotic‐assisted hepatic resection. Mean operative time was 264.8 minutes, with a mean hospital length of stay of 7.8 days. Rate of conversion was 6.6%. Cost was greater than either laparoscopy or open hepatic surgery.ConclusionsOur systematic review suggests robotic‐assisted hepatic resection is safe and feasible, with low mortality and morbidity rates. Further research is needed to determine if oncological outcomes are similar. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2013Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.1500&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 25 citations 25 popularity Average influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2013 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2013Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.1500&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2011Publisher:Wiley Aliyah, Kanji; Richdeep S, Gill; Xinzhe, Shi; Daniel W, Birch; Shahzeer, Karmali;doi: 10.1002/rcs.432
pmid: 22113977
AbstractBackgroundColorectal surgery is one of the most common procedures performed by general surgeons, with an increasing number being performed laparoscopically. Robotic technology is emerging in the ongoing evolution in minimally invasive surgery. This study systematically reviews the literature regarding the safety and feasibility of robotic‐assisted colorectal surgery.MethodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases was completed for the period 2000 to 2010. Two independent reviewers assessed the studies for relevance and inclusion, and extracted data.ResultsAfter an initial screen of 347 titles, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 854 patients were included with a mean age of 61 years and a body mass index of 25.5 kg/m2. Major complications included 27 anastamotic leaks (27/766 = 3.5%), 10 post‐operative bleeds (1.1%) and 14 post‐operative infections (1.6%). There were no mortalities reported.ConclusionsThis systematic review demonstrates that robotic‐assisted colorectal surgery is emerging as a safe and feasible option in colorectal surgery. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2011 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2011Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.432&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 30 citations 30 popularity Average influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2011 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2011Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.432&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2010Publisher:Wiley Authors: K C, Veluvolu; W T, Ang;K C, Veluvolu; W T, Ang;doi: 10.1002/rcs.340
pmid: 20623480
AbstractBackgroundPhysiological tremor is the main cause of imprecision in microsurgical procedures/robotics applications. Existing methods, such as weighted‐frequency Fourier linear combiner (WFLC), rely on estimating the tremor under the assumption that it has a single dominant frequency. This paper focuses on developing a new algorithm for accurate tremor filtering in real time.MethodsA study conducted on several novice subjects and microsurgeons showed the tremor to contain several dominant frequencies in a band, rather than a single dominant frequency. Based on the tremor characteristics, a new algorithm band‐limited multiple Fourier linear combiner (BMFLC) has been developed to estimate a band of signals with multiple dominant frequencies. A separation procedure to separate the intended motion/drift from the tremor portion is also discussed.ResultsA simulation study was first conducted to validate the theoretical development on recorded tremor data. The experimental set‐up was designed to study the real‐time performance of the proposed algorithm. Tremor sensing using accelerometers is also discussed, with the proposed algorithm. Our experiments showed that the developed BMFLC algorithm had an average tremor compensation of 64% compared to 43% for the WFLC algorithm in real‐time for one degree of freedom (1‐DOF) cancellation of tremor.ConclusionsThe BMFLC algorithm can be applied for the three axes separately and 3‐DOF cancellation of tremor can be achieved. Further research is required to deal with complex gestures involved during microsurgery. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2010 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2010Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.340&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 71 citations 71 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2010 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2010Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.340&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2009Publisher:Wiley H S S, Ho; P, Mohan; E D, Lim; D L, Li; J S P, Yuen; W S, Ng; W K O, Lau; C W S, Cheng;doi: 10.1002/rcs.232
pmid: 19145573
AbstractBackgroundWe introduce the first robotic ultrasound‐guided prostate intervention device and evaluate its safety, accuracy and repeatability.MethodsThe robotic positioning system (RPS) determines a target's x, y and z axes. It is situated with a biplane ultrasound probe on a mobile horizontal platform. The integrated software acquires ultrasound images for three‐dimensional (3D) modelling, coordinates target planning and directs the RPS.ResultsThe egg phantom evaluates the software's safety and workflow protocol. Two random targets are planned in each quadrant and biopsy needles are inserted. All were within three separate eggs. Metal wire tips are targeted and their distances from the biopsy needle tips are measured. With 20 wires, < 1 mm accuracy is obtained. Repeatability is demonstrated when previous positions are returned to with similar accuracy.ConclusionOur device demonstrates safety in a defined boundary with a repeatable accuracy of < 1 mm. It can be used for accurate prostate biopsy and treatment delivery. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2009Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.232&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 35 citations 35 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: CrossrefInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted SurgeryArticle . 2009Data sources: Europe PubMed Centraladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/rcs.232&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu