Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Searching FieldsTerms
Any field
arrow_drop_down
includes
arrow_drop_down
The following results are related to Rural Digital Europe. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.

  • Rural Digital Europe
  • Other research products
  • DE
  • “Lituanistika”, International Resea...

Date (most recent)
arrow_drop_down
  • image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
    Authors: Kriščiukaitienė, Irena; Galnaitytė, Aistė; Schwarz, Gerald;

    Straipsnio idėja kilo bendradarbiaujant su ES šalių mokslininkais 6-osios Bendrosios programos projekte AGRIGRID. Vykdant projektą buvo pastebėta, kad skirtingos ES šalys 2007–2013 nacionalinėse kaimo plėtros programose (KPP) pasirinko skirtingus prioritetus, priemones ir nevienodai paskirstė lėšas. Pagrindinis šio straipsnio tikslas yra apžvelgti Lietuvos ir Škotijos KPP įgyvendinimą, akcentuojant kaimo plėtros prioritetus ir žemės ūkio ir kaimo vietovių svarbiausius iššūkius. Darbe pateikta svarbiausių socialinių ir ekonominių rodiklių analizė, Lietuvos ir Škotijos KPP stipriosios ir silpnosios pusės. Lietuvos ir Škotijos KPP yra numatyti panašūs tikslai, kurie abiejose šalyse buvo nustatomi pagal ES teisės aktus, reglamentuojančius kaimo plėtrą. Nepaisant to, minėtų programų analizė parodė, kad programų prioritetai skiriasi atsižvelgiant į socialinius, ekonominius, biologinius ir technologinius veiksnius. Tyrimo rezultate pateikti pasiūlymai ateičiai tobulinant KPP dėl skirtingos šalių situacijos ir specifinių šalių savybių. The idea for this article arose collaborating with researchers from EU countries within the 6th Framework project AGRIGRID. During the project it was noticed, that different EU countries have chosen different priorities, measures and budget allocation when preparing the National Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) for 2007-2013. The main aim of this paper is to review the implementation of rural development programmes in Lithuania and Scotland in the context of derived rural development priorities and existing key challenges of agriculture and rural areas. Following a comparison of the socio-economic indicators, strengths and weaknesses of the RDPs in both countries are explored. The results suggest that the differences in programme priorities are driven by socio-economic and bio-physical characteristics in Lithuania and Scotland. The analysis concludes with proposals for future amendments to the RDPs considering the specific circumstances and characteristics in the two case study countries.

    image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ “Lituanistika”, Inte...arrow_drop_down
    image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
    0
    citations0
    popularityAverage
    influenceAverage
    impulseAverage
    BIP!Powered by BIP!
    more_vert
      image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ “Lituanistika”, Inte...arrow_drop_down
      image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Searching FieldsTerms
Any field
arrow_drop_down
includes
arrow_drop_down
The following results are related to Rural Digital Europe. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
  • image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
    Authors: Kriščiukaitienė, Irena; Galnaitytė, Aistė; Schwarz, Gerald;

    Straipsnio idėja kilo bendradarbiaujant su ES šalių mokslininkais 6-osios Bendrosios programos projekte AGRIGRID. Vykdant projektą buvo pastebėta, kad skirtingos ES šalys 2007–2013 nacionalinėse kaimo plėtros programose (KPP) pasirinko skirtingus prioritetus, priemones ir nevienodai paskirstė lėšas. Pagrindinis šio straipsnio tikslas yra apžvelgti Lietuvos ir Škotijos KPP įgyvendinimą, akcentuojant kaimo plėtros prioritetus ir žemės ūkio ir kaimo vietovių svarbiausius iššūkius. Darbe pateikta svarbiausių socialinių ir ekonominių rodiklių analizė, Lietuvos ir Škotijos KPP stipriosios ir silpnosios pusės. Lietuvos ir Škotijos KPP yra numatyti panašūs tikslai, kurie abiejose šalyse buvo nustatomi pagal ES teisės aktus, reglamentuojančius kaimo plėtrą. Nepaisant to, minėtų programų analizė parodė, kad programų prioritetai skiriasi atsižvelgiant į socialinius, ekonominius, biologinius ir technologinius veiksnius. Tyrimo rezultate pateikti pasiūlymai ateičiai tobulinant KPP dėl skirtingos šalių situacijos ir specifinių šalių savybių. The idea for this article arose collaborating with researchers from EU countries within the 6th Framework project AGRIGRID. During the project it was noticed, that different EU countries have chosen different priorities, measures and budget allocation when preparing the National Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) for 2007-2013. The main aim of this paper is to review the implementation of rural development programmes in Lithuania and Scotland in the context of derived rural development priorities and existing key challenges of agriculture and rural areas. Following a comparison of the socio-economic indicators, strengths and weaknesses of the RDPs in both countries are explored. The results suggest that the differences in programme priorities are driven by socio-economic and bio-physical characteristics in Lithuania and Scotland. The analysis concludes with proposals for future amendments to the RDPs considering the specific circumstances and characteristics in the two case study countries.

    image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ “Lituanistika”, Inte...arrow_drop_down
    image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
    0
    citations0
    popularityAverage
    influenceAverage
    impulseAverage
    BIP!Powered by BIP!
    more_vert
      image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ “Lituanistika”, Inte...arrow_drop_down
      image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Powered by OpenAIRE graph