- home
- Advanced Search
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
Loading
- Open AccessAuthors:Walton, Stephanie; Livermore, Laurence; Bánki, Olaf; Cubey, Robert; Drinkwater, Robyn; Englund, Markus; Goble, Carole; Groom, Quentin; Kermorvant, Christopher; Rey, Isabel; +4 moreWalton, Stephanie; Livermore, Laurence; Bánki, Olaf; Cubey, Robert; Drinkwater, Robyn; Englund, Markus; Goble, Carole; Groom, Quentin; Kermorvant, Christopher; Rey, Isabel; Santos, Celia; Scott, Ben; Williams, Alan; Wu, Zhengzhe;Publisher: ZenodoProject: EC | SYNTHESYS PLUS (823827)
Tools and services evaluation speadsheet
- Research data . 2017Open AccessAuthors:Ofner, Patrick; Schwarz, Andreas; Pereira, Joana; Müller-Putz, Gernot R.;Ofner, Patrick; Schwarz, Andreas; Pereira, Joana; Müller-Putz, Gernot R.;Publisher: ZenodoProject: EC | MoreGrasp (643955), EC | Feel your Reach (681231)
How neural correlates of movements are represented in the human brain is of ongoing interest and has been researched with invasive and non-invasive methods. In this study, we analyzed the encoding of single upper limb movements in the time-domain of low-frequency electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Fifteen healthy subjects executed and imagined six different sustained upper limb movements. We classified these six movements and a rest class and obtained significant average classification accuracies of 55% (movement vs movement) and 87% (movement vs rest) for executed movements, and 27% and 73%, respectively, for imagined movements. Furthermore, we analyzed the classifier patterns in the source space and located the brain areas conveying discriminative movement information. The classifier patterns indicate that mainly premotor areas, primary motor cortex, somatosensory cortex and posterior parietal cortex convey discriminative movement information. The decoding of single upper limb movements is specially interesting in the context of a more natural non-invasive control of e.g., a motor neuroprosthesis or a robotic arm in highly motor disabled persons. Please cite the paper http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182578 if you use this dataset.
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product. - Research data . 2016 . Embargo End Date: 23 Mar 2017Open Access EnglishAuthors:Van Dromme, Ilse C.; Premereur, Elsie; Verhoef, Bram-Ernst; Vanduffel, Wim; Janssen, Peter;Van Dromme, Ilse C.; Premereur, Elsie; Verhoef, Bram-Ernst; Vanduffel, Wim; Janssen, Peter;
doi: 10.5061/dryad.t402g
Publisher: DryadProject: NSF | LIP: The Gate of Frontal ... (0745436), EC | BRAINSHAPE (260607)The primate visual system consists of a ventral stream, specialized for object recognition, and a dorsal visual stream, which is crucial for spatial vision and actions. However, little is known about the interactions and information flow between these two streams. We investigated these interactions within the network processing three-dimensional (3D) object information, comprising both the dorsal and ventral stream. Reversible inactivation of the macaque caudal intraparietal area (CIP) during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reduced fMRI activations in posterior parietal cortex in the dorsal stream and, surprisingly, also in the inferotemporal cortex (ITC) in the ventral visual stream. Moreover, CIP inactivation caused a perceptual deficit in a depth-structure categorization task. CIP-microstimulation during fMRI further suggests that CIP projects via posterior parietal areas to the ITC in the ventral stream. To our knowledge, these results provide the first causal evidence for the flow of visual 3D information from the dorsal stream to the ventral stream, and identify CIP as a key area for depth-structure processing. Thus, combining reversible inactivation and electrical microstimulation during fMRI provides a detailed view of the functional interactions between the two visual processing streams. openData_newxls files contain percent signal change per run.img/hdr files show tvalues for contrasts see readme.txt for more information
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
Loading
- Open AccessAuthors:Walton, Stephanie; Livermore, Laurence; Bánki, Olaf; Cubey, Robert; Drinkwater, Robyn; Englund, Markus; Goble, Carole; Groom, Quentin; Kermorvant, Christopher; Rey, Isabel; +4 moreWalton, Stephanie; Livermore, Laurence; Bánki, Olaf; Cubey, Robert; Drinkwater, Robyn; Englund, Markus; Goble, Carole; Groom, Quentin; Kermorvant, Christopher; Rey, Isabel; Santos, Celia; Scott, Ben; Williams, Alan; Wu, Zhengzhe;Publisher: ZenodoProject: EC | SYNTHESYS PLUS (823827)
Tools and services evaluation speadsheet
- Research data . 2017Open AccessAuthors:Ofner, Patrick; Schwarz, Andreas; Pereira, Joana; Müller-Putz, Gernot R.;Ofner, Patrick; Schwarz, Andreas; Pereira, Joana; Müller-Putz, Gernot R.;Publisher: ZenodoProject: EC | MoreGrasp (643955), EC | Feel your Reach (681231)
How neural correlates of movements are represented in the human brain is of ongoing interest and has been researched with invasive and non-invasive methods. In this study, we analyzed the encoding of single upper limb movements in the time-domain of low-frequency electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Fifteen healthy subjects executed and imagined six different sustained upper limb movements. We classified these six movements and a rest class and obtained significant average classification accuracies of 55% (movement vs movement) and 87% (movement vs rest) for executed movements, and 27% and 73%, respectively, for imagined movements. Furthermore, we analyzed the classifier patterns in the source space and located the brain areas conveying discriminative movement information. The classifier patterns indicate that mainly premotor areas, primary motor cortex, somatosensory cortex and posterior parietal cortex convey discriminative movement information. The decoding of single upper limb movements is specially interesting in the context of a more natural non-invasive control of e.g., a motor neuroprosthesis or a robotic arm in highly motor disabled persons. Please cite the paper http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182578 if you use this dataset.
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product. - Research data . 2016 . Embargo End Date: 23 Mar 2017Open Access EnglishAuthors:Van Dromme, Ilse C.; Premereur, Elsie; Verhoef, Bram-Ernst; Vanduffel, Wim; Janssen, Peter;Van Dromme, Ilse C.; Premereur, Elsie; Verhoef, Bram-Ernst; Vanduffel, Wim; Janssen, Peter;
doi: 10.5061/dryad.t402g
Publisher: DryadProject: NSF | LIP: The Gate of Frontal ... (0745436), EC | BRAINSHAPE (260607)The primate visual system consists of a ventral stream, specialized for object recognition, and a dorsal visual stream, which is crucial for spatial vision and actions. However, little is known about the interactions and information flow between these two streams. We investigated these interactions within the network processing three-dimensional (3D) object information, comprising both the dorsal and ventral stream. Reversible inactivation of the macaque caudal intraparietal area (CIP) during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reduced fMRI activations in posterior parietal cortex in the dorsal stream and, surprisingly, also in the inferotemporal cortex (ITC) in the ventral visual stream. Moreover, CIP inactivation caused a perceptual deficit in a depth-structure categorization task. CIP-microstimulation during fMRI further suggests that CIP projects via posterior parietal areas to the ITC in the ventral stream. To our knowledge, these results provide the first causal evidence for the flow of visual 3D information from the dorsal stream to the ventral stream, and identify CIP as a key area for depth-structure processing. Thus, combining reversible inactivation and electrical microstimulation during fMRI provides a detailed view of the functional interactions between the two visual processing streams. openData_newxls files contain percent signal change per run.img/hdr files show tvalues for contrasts see readme.txt for more information
Average popularityAverage popularity In bottom 99%Average influencePopularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.Average influence In bottom 99%Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.add Add to ORCIDPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.